The Tinker Foundation Inc.
Institutional Grants Program




Program Description
To be considered for a Tinker Institutional Grant, a proposal must be submitted by an institutional entity and be geographically focused on Latin America, Iberia or Antarctica. Topically, the projects should deal with environmental policy, governance or economic policy. Support may be sought for, but is not limited to, research projects, conferences and workshops. The Foundation encourages collaboration between and among organizations in the United States, Latin America, Spain and Portugal.

Prior to developing a full proposal, and well before the deadline, you may wish to submit a brief description of the project to ascertain the Foundation's interest.

For questions concerning an institutional grant application or a printed version of the application instructions, please contact the Foundation at tinker@tinker.org or
(212) 421-6858. If you wish to submit a proposal, you may use a print-out or a self-generated copy of the application form on this site.

Selection of 2007 Grants
Economic Policy

Center for Global Development
Washington, D.C.
Nancy Birdsall:  nbirdsall@cgdev.org
A two-year $100,000 grant to support research on the association between reforms and economic growth in Latin America

Fundación Centro para la Estabilidad Financiera
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Silvina G. Vatnick:  cef@cefargentina.org
A two-year $140,000 award for a project to improve financial policy making and financial literacy in Argentina among national legislators, the judiciary, journalists and consumers

Instituto de Estudios sobre la Realidad Argentina y Latinoamericana
Córdoba, Argentina
Nadin Arganaraz:  nadinar@ieral.org
A $30,000 grant for a project to improve fiscal transparency at the municipal and provincial levels in Argentina

Environmental Policy

The Nature Conservancy, Inc.
Arlington, Virginia
Miguel Calmon:  mcalmon@tnc.org
A two-year $120,000 grant for a project to enhance conservation of Brazil's Atlantic Forest through expansion of the use of Brazil's "Ecological Value-Added Tax"

New York Botanical Garden
Bronx, New York
Christine Padoch:  cpadoch@nybg.org
A two-year $140,000 grant to promote practices and policies in Amazonian forestry that sustain the environment, regional economies and local livelihoods

Rainforest Alliance, Inc.
New York, New York
Katherine Pierront:  kpierront@ra.org
A two-year $130,000 grant to promote and implement the graduated forestry certification process, SmartStep, in Bolivia and Peru

Rare
Arlington, Virginia
Matt Humke:  mhumke@rareconservation.org
$70,000 for a project to systematize and replicate the economic and conservation successes of a community ecotourism enterprise in the Yucatan Peninsula’s Sian Ka’an Biosphere Reserve

University of California, The Regents of the
Berkeley, California
Paul A. Berkman:  berkman@bren.ucsb.edu
UC Santa Barbara
A $60,000 grant to the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management to organize the Antarctic Treaty Summit, which will assess interactions between science and policy as a source of the success of the treaty and as an example for other international agreements

Governance

Amherst College
Amherst, Massachusetts
Javier Corrales:  jcorrales@amherst.edu
A $35,000 grant for a project assessing community-managed schools in Honduras and Guatemala and whether parental participation in school councils influences civic behavior in general

Asociacion por los Derechos Civiles
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Roberto Saba:  adc@adc.org.ar
A $43,000 grant to deepen reforms in the Argentine judiciary that increase transparency and improve the functioning of national and provincial level courts

Editora Instituto Fernand Braudel de Economia Mundial
São Paulo, Brazil
Norman Gall:  ngall@braudel.org.br
A two-year $100,000 grant in support of a project on school reform in the municipalities of São Paulo and Pernambuco, Brazil

Fundacion Ciudadana para las Americas
Santiago, Chile
Jorge Osorio Vargas:  josorio@fdla.cl
A $49,000 grant for a project to improve accountability in civil society organizations

Strategies for International Development
Arlington, Virginia
Charles A. Patterson:  cpatterson@sidworld.org
A two-year $120,000 grant for a project to scale up implementation of Bolivia's rural development policy and to improve implementation of the “Citizen Participation Reform and Policy”

Tlachinollan Grupo de Apoyo a los Pueblos Indios de la Montana, A.C.
Tlapa de Comonfort, Guerreo, Mexico
Abel Barrera:  cdhm@tlachinollan.org
A $50,000 grant to cover costs associated with an international seminar to design a citizen police monitoring program in Guerrero

University of Miami
Coral Gables, Florida
Susan Kaufman Purcell:  skpurcell@miami.edu
Center for Hemispheric Policy
A $140,000 grant to support a two-year program, co-directed by the Center for Research on Development in Mexico City, to assess Mexico's prospects for economic and political reform under President Felipe Calderón


Application Deadlines and Procedures
Applications for the institutional grants program are considered biannually by the Board of Directors in mid-June and mid-December. The deadline for receipt of proposals for the summer meeting is March 1st; for the winter meeting it is September 15th. These dates represent final deadlines for consideration of proposals. We urge and strongly advise those seeking support to submit proposals to the Foundation well in advance of these closing dates. Discussion and consultation may be required prior to the acceptance of a proposal for serious consideration and recommendation to the Board of Directors.

Complete proposals should be prepared according to the instructions. They must be submitted in English, otherwise they will not be accepted for processing.

 
Application Instructions
The following information will instruct you on the content and format of the proposal. Two copies of the complete proposal, without binders and in English, should be sent to the Foundation's President, Ms. Renate Rennie. All institutions, even if previously funded by the Tinker Foundation, are required to include all the items on the checklist. Incomplete proposals may cause a substantial delay in the Foundation's review.

Proposal Checklist

  1. Proposal cover sheet

  2. Separate one-page summary of the proposal briefly describing the project's objectives, target audience or beneficiaries, proposed methodology and plan for dissemination of results. (Attach the summary to the application cover sheet.)

  3. Full proposal providing details on the project's objectives and theoretical, practical and/or policy-related significance (as both a discrete endeavor and within the broader field)

  4. Plan of work describing the activities to be conducted and indicating any factors that could serve to delay the plan, change the length of time required to complete the project, or alter the proposed budgetary designations

  5. Anticipated results of the project

  6. Specific plan for dissemination of the results (identify the target audience and the means by which it will be reached)

  7. Description of the plan to evaluate the short- and long-term impact of the project's results upon completion

  8. Names and addresses of three individuals familiar with the proposed topic/field but not directly involved with the project

  9. Itemized budget for the cost of the entire project

  10. Itemized budget for those expenses for which Tinker Foundation support is sought. (As a general rule, the Foundation does not pay for overhead or indirect costs. In those exceptional cases when it is considered absolutely necessary, a maximum of 10% of the project's direct costs may be included as overhead in the budget.)

  11. Copy of the letter from the Internal Revenue Service attesting to the organization's tax-exempt status (applies only to U.S. organizations)

  12. Copy of the organization's latest Federal/State Form 990 (applies only to U.S. organizations)

  13. Copy of the organization's latest financial statement

  14. Qualifications of the project director and personnel with curricula vitae attached

  15. Complete list of the organization's staff and its Board of Directors

  16. Brief narrative statement providing an historical overview of the institution

If there are any questions concerning these application procedures, please do not hesitate to contact the Foundation.

Reporting Requirements
During the term of the grant, the recipient is responsible for submitting appropriate written reports on activities and expenditures. Upon completion of the grant, a full narrative and financial accounting is required. A Foundation representative may make a site visit for evaluating selected grant activities. At the time of the announcement of the award, the Foundation will provide specific instructions for the preparation of the reports.

Narrative Reports

Listed below is the information which should be included in your narrative report. In the case of multi-year grants several of the items may not be applicable when interim reports are prepared and should be so noted. Feel free to add any other information which you consider pertinent. In addition, please note that all reports to the Foundation must be submitted in English. Where grant findings are based on substantial statistical and/or narrative background data available only in Spanish or Portuguese, we will require that an executive summary of this material be included with your report.

  1. Provide a brief overview of the original goals and objectives (both short- and long-term) of the project. What was the rationale behind the development of the project, or what is the nature of the problem which the grant activities were to address?

  2. Describe the activities which took place as a result of our grant.

  3. Provide a brief summary (no more than one page) of the findings or the accomplishments of the project. Did the project meet the goals and objectives set forth in the original proposal? Were there any surprises?

  4. What internal and external factors contributed to or impeded the project's success? If any problems were encountered, how were they dealt with?

  5. What unanticipated results (good or bad) did the project yield?

  6. What was the target audience for the results of this project? How did you make sure the results reached the appropriate audience? Is there evidence that this audience has made use of these results?

  7. What short-term impact have the project's results had on the particular field of study and the policy making and/or scholarly community?

  8. What do you anticipate as the longer-term effects of the outcome of the project on this community? Do you expect the results of the project to stimulate further activity or research in this subject area?

  9. Did the project yield any products such as publications, etc.? If so, how was this product distributed to the appropriate audience? (Note: Please be sure that the Tinker Foundation receives at least four copies of any publication or other product resulting from the project when they become available.)

  10. What is this project's value as a model or demonstration of new techniques or approaches which could be replicated elsewhere?

  11. Identify project personnel and participants and describe their roles in these activities. If there were any personnel changes, how did this affect the project?

  12. Did the original project budget prove to be feasible? Were there changes in the allocations for specific budget items? Why? If the original budget did not prove feasible, why did this happen and how was the project affected? List sources and amounts of any additional funding received, if applicable.

  13. What impact has this project had on your institution? Will it continue to work in this area? If so, how?

  14. If this project's activities are expected to continue beyond the term of the Tinker Foundation grant, what are the plans for its future? How will the project be financed in the future?

Financial Reports

To fulfill the Foundation's financial reporting requirements it is necessary only to fill in the "Funds Expended" column of the "Approved Grant Budget" sheet that you received with your grant announcement letter. This form should be returned to the Foundation when submitting the narrative report.

Please Note: The Foundation is unable to consider new funding requests from an organization until previously funded projects have been completed and the final reports have been received and approved. If there are any questions regarding these reporting procedures, do not hesitate to contact us.


Proposal Cover SheetField Research GrantsHome